When the Mazda CX-50 was first introduced, many speculated about its place in Mazda’s lineup. Would it replace the popular CX-5, or would they coexist? Historically, Mazda has employed both strategies, either directly replacing models or keeping older versions as budget options. While some anticipated the CX-5’s retirement, Mazda has opted to keep it in production alongside the CX-50. This positions the CX-5 as the more budget-conscious choice, while the CX-50 emerges as the newer, slightly more upscale compact SUV. Understanding the nuances between these two models is key for prospective buyers.
Size and Dimensions: Space Where It Matters
Both the CX-5 and CX-50 compete within the crowded compact SUV segment. However, the CX-5 leans towards the smaller end of this category. At 180 inches long, it’s noticeably shorter than rivals like the Honda CR-V or Volkswagen Tiguan. While this might seem marginal, it translates to less rear legroom, which can be a squeeze for taller passengers. The CR-V and Tiguan offer significantly more spacious rear seating.
Mazda addressed the demand for increased space with the CX-50. It extends 6 inches longer than the CX-5, resulting in both enhanced passenger room and a larger cargo area. While the CR-V and Tiguan still maintain a lead in overall spaciousness, the CX-50 offers a more comfortable and practical interior compared to the CX-5, bridging the gap for those needing a bit more room.
Performance and Engine Options: Familiar Power, Future Hybrid
In terms of performance, Mazda has maintained engine parity between the CX-5 and CX-50 for core models. Both SUVs share the same powertrain options. The standard engine is a 2.5-liter four-cylinder producing 187 horsepower and 185 lb-ft of torque. For those seeking more spirited performance, a turbocharged 2.5-liter variant is available, delivering 227 hp and 310 lb-ft of torque on regular gasoline, or an even more robust 256 hp and 320 lb-ft when using 93 octane fuel. Equipped with the turbo engine, both the CX-5 and CX-50 rank among the quicker non-luxury compact SUVs available, offering responsive acceleration and engaging driving dynamics.
However, the CX-50 distinguishes itself with future powertrain options. Starting with the 2025 model year, the CX-50 will introduce a Toyota-sourced hybrid powertrain. This system combines a 2.5-liter four-cylinder engine with three electric motors, achieving a combined output of 219 hp and 163 lb-ft of torque. The key advantage of the CX-50 Hybrid is its significantly improved fuel efficiency, boasting an EPA-estimated 38 mpg in combined driving. This is a substantial leap compared to the standard engine’s 28 mpg combined and the turbo engine’s 25 mpg combined. Currently, a hybrid option is not offered for the CX-5, making it a crucial differentiator for the CX-50 and appealing to environmentally conscious buyers or those prioritizing fuel savings.
Conclusion: Choosing Between CX-5 and CX-50
Deciding between the Mazda CX-5 and CX-50 hinges on individual needs and priorities. The CX-5 remains a compelling option for budget-minded buyers seeking a stylish and well-handling compact SUV. It offers Mazda’s signature driving experience at a more accessible price point. Conversely, the CX-50 caters to those desiring a bit more space, a slightly more rugged aesthetic, and the eventual option of a fuel-efficient hybrid powertrain. While both are excellent compact SUVs, the CX-50 aims to broaden Mazda’s appeal within the segment by offering increased versatility and forward-looking technology. Ultimately, the “better” choice depends on whether you prioritize value and Mazda heritage (CX-5) or enhanced space and future hybrid efficiency (CX-50).
